Bloomberg reports that officials leading the debate, including Federal Reserve Governor Daniel Tarullo, Dallas Fed President Richard Fisher and Senator Sherrod Brown, share the view that the 2010 Dodd-Frank Act failed to curb the growth of large banks after promising in its preamble to 'end too big to fail'.
Strategies under consideration range from legislation that would cap the size of big banks or make them raise more capital to regulatory actions to discourage mergers or require that financial firms hold specified levels of long-term debt to convert into equity in a failure.
The push for revisiting the law or writing new rules 'is absolutely driven by a sense that Dodd-Frank did not end too big to fail', said Mark Calabria, director of financial-regulation studies at the Cato Institute in Washington and a former aide to Senator Richard Shelby of Alabama when he was the ranking Republican on the Banking Committee.
Three of the four largest U.S. banks - JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM), Bank of America Corp. and Wells Fargo & Co. (WFC) - are bigger today than they were in 2007, heightening the risk of economic damage if one gets into trouble. JPMorgan’s 2012 trading loss of more than $6.2bn from a bet on credit derivatives raised questions anew about whether the largest institutions have grown too complex for oversight.
Hit the link below to access the complete Bloomberg article: