Joseph’s trading resulted in a net profit of £591,117 on trading between September 2007 and July 2008.
Joseph, a former futures trader, was provided with confidential and price-sensitive information from two investment banks concerning proposed or forthcoming takeover bids. The confidential and price-sensitive information was provided to Richard Joseph by Ersin Mustafa, a print room manager at JP Morgan Cazenove. During the time that he was trading Richard Joseph transferred a substantial amount of money to Ersin Mustafa.
Attempts were made to disguise the receipt of this information including the use of numerous Pay As You Go mobile telephones - one of which was purchased using a false name and address - and webmail “drop boxes” where confidential documents containing price-sensitive information were placed for Joseph to access. Having received this information, Joseph then placed spread bets in the expectation that when the information became public knowledge the share price would rise and he would make a profit.
Ersin Mustafa, who is believed to be in north Cyprus, was also a source of inside information in the prosecution of Ali Mustafa, Pardip Saini, Paresh Shah, Neten Shah, Bijal Shah and Truptesh Patel who were convicted and sentenced in July 2012. The link between these two cases could not be published before now.
In sentencing Richard Joseph the trial judge, His Honour Judge Pegden, remarked: 'It is plain to me that you knew precisely what you were doing. This was carefully planned and much discussed between you; before, during and after the trades. This was not isolated criminal behaviour'.
The Judge also commented that there was a need for an element of deterrence when sentencing this case, not least because this type of behaviour is difficult and time consuming to detect.
Tracey McDermott, director of enforcement and financial crime, said: 'This conviction once again underscores our determination to take the strongest possible action against anyone involved in insider dealing. Joseph embarked on a sophisticated scheme which was designed to enable him to profit from exploiting confidential price sensitive information and at the expense of other market users. In less than a year his criminal conduct netted him sums of money most people can only dream of. For a time he no doubt thought this was easy money. This verdict should send a clear message about the consequences to anyone else who might be tempted to do the same'.